A. The relationship anywhere between recombination volume and you may genetic distance for the eukaryotes

E. (1952)

Jevons, M. P., and you will Parker, M. T. (1964). J. din. Street., 17, 243-250. Lidwell, 0. M. (1959). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 18,49-52. Alive, We., and you may Nichols, A great. C. (1961).J. inject. Dis.,108, 195-204. Macdonald, Good. (1946). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 5, 230-233. Meyer, W. (1966). Zentbl. Bukt. PurusitKde., I . Abt. Orig., 201,465-481. Meyer, W. (1967). J. Hyg., Camb., 65,439-447. Nakagawa, Yards. (1960). Jap. J. damp. Res., 8, 331-342. Oeding, P., and Williams, R. Elizabeth. 0. (1958). step three. Hyg., Cumb., 56, 445-454. Pagano, J. S., Farrer, S. M., Plotkin, S. An effective., Brachman, P. S., Fekety, F. R., and you will Pidcoe, V. (1960). Science, N.Y., 131, 927-928. Parker, M. T. (1966). In “The Scientific Basis off Treatments Annual Comment” (J. P. Ross, ed.), pp. 157-173. School of London, New Athlone Force, London. Parker, M. T., Todinson, Good. J. H., and Williams, R. Elizabeth. 0. (1955). J. Hyg., Cumb., 53,458-473.

The fresh parasexual years and its use in genetic analysis

Pether, J. V. S. (1968).J. Hyg., C a great d . , 66,605. Poole, P. M., and you may Baker, J. Roentgen. (1966). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., twenty five, 116-123. Declaration (1959). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl.,9, 115-118. Declaration (1963). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl., thirteen, 119-122. Report (1967). Int. Bull. buct. Nomencl., 17, 113-125. Report (1971). Int. Bull. syst. Buct., 21, 165, 167, 171. Rountree, P. Meters. (1959). J. gen. Microbiol., 20,620-633. Rountree, P. Yards., and you will Asheshov, E. H. (1961). J. gen. Microbiol., twenty six, 111-122. Rountree, P. Meters., and you will Freeman, B. Meters. (1955). Med. J. Aust., 2, 157-161. Ruys, A. C., and Borst, J. (1959). Antonie wan Leeuwenhoek, 25, 237-240. Seto, J. T., and Wilson, J. B. (1958). Am.step 3. moist. Res., 19, 241-246. Smith, H. W. (1948a).J. Hyg., C u d . , 46,7681. Smith, H. W. (1948b);Jp. Highway. Ther., 58, 179-188. Smith, H. W. (1954).J. Highway. Buc

Tarr, H. A beneficial. (1958). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 17, 64-72. Watson, W. A beneficial. (1965). Veterinarian. Rec., 77, 477-480. Wentworth, B., Romig, W. R., and you will Dixon, W. J. (1964). J. contaminate. Dis.,114, 179188.

Williams, Roentgen. Elizabeth soulsingles telefonní číslo. 0. (1957). Zentbl. Bakt. PurasitKde., I . Abt. Orig., 168, 528-532. Williams, R. Age. O., and you will Jevons, M. P. (1961). Zentbl. Bukt. ParasitKde., I Abt. Orig., 181,349-358. Williams, Roentgen. Elizabeth. O., and Rippon, J. J. Hyg., Camb., 50, 320-353. Williams, Roentgen. E. O., Rippon, J. Elizabeth., and you will Dowsett, L. Yards. (1953). Lancet, i, 510-514. Wilson, Grams. S., and you will Atkinson, J. D. (1945). Lancet, we, 647-649.

Hereditary Analysis in the Small-bacteria DAVID Good. HOPWOOD John Znnes Institute, Norwikh, England We. Introduction . 11. Segregation just like the Proof of Simple Genetic Handle . A beneficial. Brand new hereditary approach to biology . B. The fresh identification out-of segregation . 111. The cornerstone out of Genetic Mapping . B. The sequencing of loci for the a linkage map: multi-grounds crosses C. Linkagegroups . D. Genetic fine-framework . Age. Removal mapping . IV. Practical Hereditary Evaluating . Good. Prominence assessment . Bplementation examination . C. Epistasis . V. Genetic Investigation from inside the Eukaryotic Microorganisms . An effective. Standard considerations . 1. 2. Tetrad studies . B. Genetic data specifically bacteria 1. Aspergillus nidulans . . dos. Aspergillus niger or other “imperfect” fungus 3. Neurospora crassa . cuatro. Other ascomycetes . 5. Yeasts . 6. Filamentous basidiomycetes . eight. Ustilago . 8. Chlamydomonas reinhardii . nine. Ciliates . ten. Slime moulds VI. Hereditary Research in Prokaryotes . A great. General considerations . 1. Fertility designs and you will conjugational mapping . 2. Transduction and you will co-transduction . 3. Sales and you will co-conversion cuatro. Non-choosy investigation .

fifty 51 57 61 61 65 66 69 69 73 75 77 78 80 81 81 83 84 91 94

Hereditary data specifically organisms step one. Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium and other Enteric germs . 2. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and you will Ps. putida . step three. Bacillus subtilis cuatro. Streptmyces coelicolor or any other actinomycetes . 5. Almost every other micro-organisms C. Official mapping methods separate off recombination VII. Hereditary Investigation inside the Worms An excellent. Standard considerations . 1. Form of viral genomes 2. Bells and whistles away from virus genetics B. Hereditary investigation particularly worms step one. Bacteriophages 2. Creature viruses step 3. Plant worms VIII. Concluding Commentary Recommendations .